Please compare ScanLook with Trimble MX2.
The Trimble MX2 is a nice little unit but it's just a slight upgrade from the MDL Dynascan. In fact Trimble is an exclusive reseller of MDL's systems in certain regions.
The main difference between the baseline Dynascan and MX2 is the laser, INS, and software. The MX2 uses a better laser system with 1+cm accuracy and a range up to 250m (best case). However, MDL also has the S250 system but it's not the baseline Dynascan unit. The MX2 uses the Trimble AP20 GNSS-Inertial System which is probably a little better than the system in Dynascan. Lastly, the MX2 uses the Trimble Trident software.
Note that since Trimble has an exclusive agreement with MDL the hardware is most likely identical with the possible exception of the INS.
To compare this with ScanLook is difficult because ScanLook has so many options for scanners and INS solutions and consequently pricing. If we configure with comparable components such as an ADIS IMU/INS and a single FARO FOCUS x330 it works out like this.
ADIS requires only a single antenna. Does that make a difference? You bet. It's in size and mounting. Find an MDL user who has both and ask them. Of course, we can use dual antennas as well. We also support the wheel meter (DMI).
What about scanners? The FARO FOCUS x330 scans at 976KHz with a mirror rotation speed of 100Hz. The MX2 scans at only 36KHz and 20Hz mirror rate. This means you have to drive very slow to get much data. In addition the MX2 has a 250 meter range in perfect conditions whereas the x330 has an actual range of 330 meters with ranges possible of almost twice this. Realistically though, distance over 50 meters is of little consequence in 99% of the mobile mapping projects. Nobody is paying for data so far away.
Don't forget, you can use the X330 as a static scanner at any time. This can make a huge difference in your investment.
The MX2 has a dual-head option. ScanLook can be used with 1, 2, or 3 x330's and/or a Velodyne (or two). We prefer the single FARO and Velodyne combination. They work great together with the fantastic accuracy of the FARO and very minimal shadowing of the Velodyne.
What if you want a better INS? There is no apparent upgrade path for the MX2. ScanLook can use any of the NovAtel INS solutions and even others as well.
What about software? Trident comes with the MX2. LiDAR USA does not lock the user into any single solution. We export to a variety formats ready for use in TopoDOT, VG, Orbit, etc.
Can ScanLook do RTK? Yes, no problem. We also sell the equipment from CHC which is a Trimble-based solution.
Does ScanLook support imagery? Yes, we have our GoLook 360 camera system, but also support Point Grey's Ladybug cameras and others as well. The system is open and configurable.
What about ruggedness and durability? The FARO is the most sensitive component of the system. The rest can withstand rain
What about weight? The Mx2 starts out at 17Kg. ScanLook without the FARO attached is about 4.5 Kg. The FARO weighs at most an additional 6Kg giving a total of 10.5Kg. Does that matter? It depends upon how often you travel with it, mount it, store it, and if you want to go airborne with it or not.
Mounting? We can mount ScanLook on almost anything. It is built to be extremely flexible in this regard.
What about price? ScanLook with the ADIS and x330 kit starts at under $80k.
